Friday November 10, 2000
   Adobe.Premiere.v7.0 Feedback  DI Online Archives

Front Page
   News
  Sports
  Opinions
  Comics
  Classifieds
  Buzz
   
Features
  Online Comics
  Campus Issues
  In-Depth
  Columnists
  Sports Teams
  Sports Columnists
   
Site Information
  Contacts
  DI Staff
  Ad Rates
  DI Alumni
  Illinimedia
   

Letters

Meeting a disgrace

To the editor:

The meeting of the University's Board of Trustees with retired Judge Louis Garippo, held in Foellinger Auditorium this past Wednesday, was a disgrace to the University. Although the intent of the meeting was for the board and public to hear from Garippo and ask questions on the "dialogue" report he compiled, the meeting was abruptly called to a halt by William Engelbrecht, board chair, long before the scheduled time had passed. Dozens of questions that had been submitted went unanswered. Many of those questions challenged the substance of the report.

Instead of having an open microphone in the audience for the public to ask questions as planned, an unannounced policy of considering only written questions was instituted. Garripo and his assistant culled those questions and addressed only a chosen few. While time still permitted further questions and answers, Garippo indicated that no additional questions were to be addressed. Engelbrecht's termination of the discussion might have rescued Garippo form further embarrassment, but it also seriously negated the validity of the process the board had established.

Many have viewed the "dialogue" as little more than a very expensive charade, designed to placate the North Central Association after its condemnation of the University for lack of institutional integrity in dealing with its race-based sports mascot. Garippo's report and the meeting in Foellinger certainly substantiate that perspective and provide further fuel for the NCA and all to question the University's leadership and integrity.

Stephen J. Kaufman
professor, Department of Cell and Structural Biology


Complacence and corruption

To the editor:
We've all heard of dead people, convicted felons, non-citizens and non-registered voters somehow becoming part of the electorate, yet for some reason there are hardly any known cases of people going to prison for it. We were greeted at the polls by a sign warning us that voter fraud was a class-three felony, yet — like many laws these days — it seems completely unenforced. It seems that these signs are only there to reassure us that the process is fair and just, upholding our sense of faith in the system.

It seems the major press, having already shot itself in the foot by prematurely declaring Florida, is also afraid of compromising faith in the system. In California, there are allegations that non-citizens received mail from the Democratic party with bogus voter registration cards attached. Overseas, many U.S. military personnel have filed complaints that they did not receive their absentee ballots on time. The details on both these allegations are sketchy, and I fault the press for not getting those details. CNN, ABC and their ilk should be all over this, especially the military absentee issue — but they won't because they're afraid of public backlash.

Whether it makes a difference in the winner, crime and injustice cannot be tolerated. By ignoring criminal or unjust behavior, we are rewarding it. Our denial that there is a problem only makes it a larger problem.

Let's get the facts and clean this up.

Ken Bach
junior in engineering



Read your ballot carefully

To the editor:

In the wake of the controversy surrounding the vote in Palm Beach County, Fla., a few details have been overlooked by many, including, it seems, the national media and many protesters. 

First of all, the same style of ballot was apparently used in Cook County, Ill. There have not been the same type of reports from that county, and one could surmise that people in Cook County were not confused by their ballots. Also, the same style ballot was used four years ago in Palm Beach County with the same results; numerous ballets were disqualified because of multiple votes for the same office on a single ballot. 

What in the world were these people thinking? We would hope that a person of voting age would have enough intelligence to know that you cannot vote for two people for the same office. If voters made a mistake, they should have asked for a new ballot, as it is perfectly within their right to do so. We each spent nearly 10 minutes voting in our respective states, making sure that our ballots reflected our choices. If their votes indeed mean as much to Palm Beach County voters as they claim, perhaps more thought should have been given to the actual voting process.

Nick Zahos
graduate student

Megan Montgomery
senior in LAS



Letters Policy

The Daily Illini welcomes letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged letters from its readers. The Daily Illini reserves the right to edit any contributions and/or reject them without notification. Writers are encouraged